|
|
Revision:Historians Verdict on the Treaty of Versailles
From The Student RoomTSR Wiki > Study Help > Subjects and Revision > Revision Notes > History > Historians Verdict on the Treaty of Versailles
Anthony Wood , Europe 1815-1960 (1986)The fundamental significance of Versailles was emotional rather then rational. Allied statesmen, urged on by the pressure of public opinion, have made peace in spirit of revenge and not to guarantee national security. Lentin, Guilt At Versailles (1984)The Treaty of Versailles should have made the victors either to conciliate the enemy or destroy them. The Treaty of Versailles did neither. It did not pacify Germany, still less permanently weaken her, appearances notwithstanding, but left here scourged, humiliated and resentful. William Carr, A History Of Germany 1815-1945 (1985)Severe as the Treaty of Versailles seemed to many Germans, it should be remembered that Germany might easily have feared much worse. If Clemencau had had his way instead of being restrained by Britain and America the treaty could have been much worst for Germany. Comments |















