Register  
 
About Us | Help | Sign in
 
   

Revision:Historians Verdict on the Treaty of Versailles

From The Student Room

TSR Wiki > Study Help > Subjects and Revision > Revision Notes > History > Historians Verdict on the Treaty of Versailles


Contents

Anthony Wood , Europe 1815-1960 (1986)

The fundamental significance of Versailles was emotional rather then rational. Allied statesmen, urged on by the pressure of public opinion, have made peace in spirit of revenge and not to guarantee national security.

Lentin, Guilt At Versailles (1984)

The Treaty of Versailles should have made the victors either to conciliate the enemy or destroy them. The Treaty of Versailles did neither. It did not pacify Germany, still less permanently weaken her, appearances notwithstanding, but left here scourged, humiliated and resentful.

William Carr, A History Of Germany 1815-1945 (1985)

Severe as the Treaty of Versailles seemed to many Germans, it should be remembered that Germany might easily have feared much worse. If Clemencau had had his way instead of being restrained by Britain and America the treaty could have been much worst for Germany.

Comments

collapse
Recent Threads
 
collapse Being Put off Durham
started by: Belle88
replies: 77
last post: 1 Minute Ago
collapse London Protest?
started by: OneWayOfLife?
replies: 3
last post: 1 Minute Ago
collapse Is Taiwan a country?
started by: Jyc921
forum: Politics
replies: 40
last post: 1 Minute Ago
collapse Girl twisting hair?
started by: johnbergqvist
replies: 91
last post: 1 Minute Ago
collapse Getting a kitten
started by: anna_spanner89
replies: 5
last post: 1 Minute Ago